Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
6 June 2016

Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug)

This page contains a subset of the full datasheet, which can be found on the CABI Compendium. Some datasheets within the Compendium are access-restricted and require either an institutional login or a direct purchase. For more information on accessing the full datasheet, please see the access options help page on the CABI Digital Library.

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Planococcus citri (Risso, 1813)
Preferred Common Name
citrus mealybug
Other Scientific Names
Coccus citri (Risso)
Coccus tuliparum Bouché, 1844
Dactylopius brevispinus Targioni Tozzetti, 1881
Dactylopius citri (Risso)
Dactylopius destructor Comstock, 1881
Dactylopius tuliparum (Bouché)
Dorthesia citri (Risso, 1813)
Dorthezia citri Risso
Lecanium phyllococcus Ashmead, 1879
Phenacoccus spiriferus Hempel, 1900
Planococcoides cubanensis Ezzat and McConnell, 1956
Planococcus citricus Ezzat and McConnell, 1956
Planococcus cucurbitae Ezzat and McConnell, 1956
Pseudococcus citri (Risso)
Pseudococcus citri var. phenacocciformis Brain, 1915
Pseudococcus citricoleorum Marchal, 1908
International Common Names
English
common mealybug
Spanish
algodon del naranjo
cochinilla harinosa de los cítricos
cotonet
French
cochenille blanche de l'oranger
cochenille blanche des agrumes
cochenille de l'oranger
cochenille du cafeier
cochenille farineuse de la vigne
cochenille farineuse des agrumes
Local Common Names
Argentina
cochinilla harinosa de los citrus
Brazil
cochonilha branca
Chile
chanchito blanco de los citrus
Denmark
uldlus, kortfrynset
Finland
villakilpikirva
Germany
Gewächshausschmierlaus
Weisse Kaffeewurzellaus
Zitrus Schmierlaus
Israel
haknima hakimchit she haadar
Italy
cocciniglia bianca farinosa della vite
cocciniglia cotonosa degli agrumi
cocciniglia cotonosa della vite
Japan
mikan-no-konakaigaramusi
Mexico
cotonet del naranja
escama algodonosa
piojo harinoso de los citricos
Netherlands
citrus wolluis
witte citrus-luis
Norway
ull-lus, kortfrynset
Portugal/Madeira
cochonilha-algodao
South Africa
sitrus wolluis
Sweden
ullus, vanlig
Turkey
turuncgil unlu biti
EPPO code
PSECCI (Planococcus citri)

Pictures

Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); natural enemy. The beetle (ladybird, ladybeetle) Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (mealybug destroyer), predating a citrus mealybug.
Natural enemy
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); natural enemy. The beetle (ladybird, ladybeetle) Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (mealybug destroyer), predating a citrus mealybug.
©Sonya Broughton/Department of Agriculture & Food Western Australia/Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 US
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adults. Laboratory specimens. USA
Adults
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adults. Laboratory specimens. USA
©Jeffrey W. Lotz/Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); infestation, on marigold (Tagetes spp.). Laboratory specimens. USA
Infestation
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); infestation, on marigold (Tagetes spp.). Laboratory specimens. USA
©Chazz Hesselein/Alabama Cooperative Extension System/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); infestation, on marigold (Tagetes spp). USA.
Infestation
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); infestation, on marigold (Tagetes spp). USA.
©Chazz Hesselein/Alabama Cooperative Extension System/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); infested and damaged marigold plant (Tagetes spp). USA.
Infestation
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); infested and damaged marigold plant (Tagetes spp). USA.
©Chazz Hesselein/Alabama Cooperative Extension System/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Citrus mealybug (P. citri) on Coleus sp. (Cruciferae).
P. citri - colour illustration
Citrus mealybug (P. citri) on Coleus sp. (Cruciferae).
Mealybugs of California/CABI BioScience
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adults on leaf.
Adults
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adults on leaf.
©Clive Lau
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); on cabbage.
Adults
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); on cabbage.
©Peter A.C. Ooi/CABI BioScience
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adults, intercepted Georgia Dept. of Agriculture in Coweta County on Croton spp (Euphorbiaceae) plants from Florida, USA.
Adults
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adults, intercepted Georgia Dept. of Agriculture in Coweta County on Croton spp (Euphorbiaceae) plants from Florida, USA.
©Charles Olsen/USDA APHIS PPQ/Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 US
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adult on mint (Mentha spp). Intercepted at quarantine from Israel, by CBP Ag Specialist. December 2007.
Adult
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adult on mint (Mentha spp). Intercepted at quarantine from Israel, by CBP Ag Specialist. December 2007.
©Charles Olsen/USDA APHIS PPQ/Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 US
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adult female. Slide mounted specimen. Collected from Fiji in April 1950.
Adult female
Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug); adult female. Slide mounted specimen. Collected from Fiji in April 1950.
©Alessandra Rung/Scale Insects/USDA APHIS ITP/Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 US

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

HostFamilyHost statusReferences
Acacia (wattles)FabaceaeUnknown
Șİșman and Ülgentürk (2010)
Alpinia purpurata (red ginger)ZingiberaceaeUnknown 
Amaranthus retroflexus (redroot pigweed)AmaranthaceaeUnknown
Celepcİ et al. (2017)
Ambrosia artemisiifolia (common ragweed)AsteraceaeUnknown
Kiss et al. (2008)
Ananas comosus (pineapple)BromeliaceaeOther 
Anisophyllea laurinaAnisophylleaceaeWild host 
AnnonaAnnonaceaeOther 
Annona muricata (soursop)AnnonaceaeOther
Cham et al. (2019)
Annona squamosa (sugar apple)AnnonaceaeOther
Lopes et al. (2019)
Anthurium andreanumAraceaeUnknown
Marocico et al. (2021)
Arachis hypogaea (groundnut)FabaceaeOther 
ArecaArecaceaeOther 
BrassicaBrassicaceaeOther 
Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)FabaceaeOther 
Capsicum (peppers)SolanaceaeUnknown
Pintar et al. (2017)
Carica papaya (pawpaw)CaricaceaeOther 
Ceiba pentandra (kapok)BombacaceaeOther 
CeratoniaFabaceaeOther 
CitrusRutaceaeMain
Basheer et al. (2016)
Szita et al. (2017)
Szitap et al. (2023)
Citrus aurantiifolia (lime)RutaceaeUnknown
Marocico et al. (2021)
Kumar et al. (2022)
Citrus aurantium (sour orange)RutaceaeUnknown
Helal et al. (2000)
Citrus limon (lemon)RutaceaeUnknown
Marocico et al. (2021)
Citrus reticulata (mandarin)RutaceaeUnknown
Kumar et al. (2022)
Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)RutaceaeUnknown
Sirisena et al. (2013)
Almeida et al. (2018)
Helal et al. (2000)
Clerodendrum (Fragrant clerodendron)LamiaceaeOther 
Cocos nucifera (coconut)ArecaceaeOther 
Codiaeum variegatum (garden croton)EuphorbiaceaeOther 
Coffea (coffee)RubiaceaeOther 
Coffea canephora (robusta coffee)RubiaceaeUnknown
Rahiman and Naik (2009)
ColaSterculiaceaeOther 
ColeusLamiaceaeOther 
CrepisAsteraceaeUnknown
Szita et al. (2017)
Crossandra undulifoliaAcanthaceaeOther
Mani and Krishnamoorthy (2007)
CrotonEuphorbiaceaeOther 
Cucurbita (pumpkin)CucurbitaceaeOther 
Cynanchum racemosum var. unifarium (talayote)AsclepiadaceaeWild host 
Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)PoaceaeOther 
Cyrtosperma merkusii (giant swamp taro)AraceaeOther 
Dioscorea (yam)DioscoreaceaeOther 
Diospyros kaki (persimmon)EbenaceaeOther 
Durio zibethinus (durian)BombacaceaeUnknown
Sirisena et al. (2013)
ErythrinaFabaceaeOther 
EugeniaLithomyrtusOther 
FicusMoraceaeOther 
Ficus americana Unknown
Marocico et al. (2021)
Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)MoraceaeUnknown
Marocico et al. (2021)
Ficus microcarpa (Indian laurel tree)MoraceaeUnknown
Marocico et al. (2021)
GardeniaRubiaceaeOther 
Glycine max (soyabean)FabaceaeOther 
Gossypium hirsutum (Bourbon cotton)MalvaceaeOther 
InocarpusFabaceaeOther 
Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)ConvolvulaceaeOther
Pintar et al. (2017)
Laurus (laurel)LauraceaeUnknown
Szita et al. (2017)
Laurus nobilis (sweet bay)LauraceaeOther 
LeucaenaFabaceaeOther 
Linaria (Toadflax)ScrophulariaceaeUnknown
Celepcİ et al. (2017)
MacadamiaProteaceaeOther 
Macadamia ternifolia (Queensland nut)ProteaceaeOther 
Malus domestica (apple)RosaceaeOther 
Malva sylvestrisMalvaceaeUnknown
Celepcİ et al. (2017)
Mangifera indica (mango)AnacardiaceaeOther 
Manihot esculenta (cassava)EuphorbiaceaeOther 
Morinda Main 
Musa (banana)MusaceaeOther 
Musa x paradisiaca (plantain)MusaceaeOther 
Nephelium lappaceum (rambutan)SapindaceaeOther 
Nerium oleander (oleander)ApocynaceaeUnknown
Szita et al. (2017)
Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)SolanaceaeOther 
Ocimum basilicum (basil)LamiaceaeOther 
Olea (olive)OleaceaeOther 
Passiflora (passionflower)PassifloraceaeOther 
Passiflora edulis (passionfruit)PassifloraceaeOther 
Persea americana (avocado)LauraceaeOther 
Phaseolus lunatus (lima bean)FabaceaeOther 
Phoenix dactylifera (date-palm)ArecaceaeOther 
Portulaca oleracea (purslane)PortulacaceaeUnknown
Celepcİ et al. (2017)
Psidium guajava (guava)LithomyrtusOther
Adly et al. (2016)
PuerariaFabaceaeOther 
Punica granatum (pomegranate)PunicaceaeOther
Halima-Kamel et al. (2014)
Pyrus communis (European pear)RosaceaeOther 
Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)PoaceaeOther 
Siliqua Other 
Solanum (nightshade)SolanaceaeOther 
Solanum americanumSolanaceaeUnknown
Celepcİ et al. (2017)
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)SolanaceaeOther
Pintar et al. (2017)
Solanum tuberosum (potato)SolanaceaeOther 
Strelitzia reginae (Queens bird-of-paradise)StrelitziaceaeUnknown
Marocico et al. (2021)
Tecoma smithii Unknown
Mdellel et al. (2019)
Theobroma cacao (cocoa)MalvaceaeOther
Srinivasnaik et al. (2016)
Tradescantia fluminensis (wandering Jew)CommelinaceaeUnknown
Mdellel et al. (2019)
Trifolium incarnatum (Crimson clover)FabaceaeUnknown
Celepcİ et al. (2017)
Vanilla africanaOrchidaceaeOther 
Veronica (Speedwell)ScrophulariaceaeOther 
Vitis vinifera (grapevine)VitaceaeOther
Basheer et al. (2016)
Xanthium strumarium (common cocklebur)AsteraceaeOther 
Ziziphus mauritiana (jujube)RhamnaceaeMain 

Symptoms

P. citri feeding leads to general wilting due to sap depletion. On cocoa, flower stalks, buds and young pods are attacked (Entwistle, 1972). In Taiwan, infested immature coffee berries become deformed and drop to the ground (Moriyama, 1941).
P. citri infestation also causes indirect physical damage because sugary honeydew excreted by the mealybugs fouls plant surfaces, giving rise to sooty moulds (Gausman and Hart, 1974) that block light and air from the leaves, inhibiting photosynthesis.
Citrus mealybug is the second most important vector of several strains of Cacao swollen shoot virus;  symptoms include leaf chlorosis, root necrosis, root and stem swellings and dieback (Posnette, 1941; Cotterell, 1943).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosisDisease stage
Plants/Fruit/abnormal shape   
Plants/Fruit/external feeding   
Plants/Fruit/honeydew or sooty mould   
Plants/Fruit/premature drop   
Plants/Growing point/external feeding   
Plants/Growing point/honeydew or sooty mould   
Plants/Inflorescence/external feeding   
Plants/Inflorescence/wilt   
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours   
Plants/Leaves/honeydew or sooty mould   
Plants/Leaves/wilting   
Plants/Roots/external feeding   
Plants/Roots/stubby roots   
Plants/Stems/external feeding   
Plants/Stems/honeydew or sooty mould   

Prevention and Control

Introduction

In several countries, P. citri has been successfully controlled with chemicals and natural enemies or a combination of the two. Attempts have also been made to control the pest using semiochemicals, cultural methods and resistant plant material.

Cultural Control and Sanitary Measures

Keeping fruit trees pruned so that they do not touch each other may help slow spread of P. citri, and cleaning farm equipment and other objects immediately after use in the field can help prevent its transport between trees and orchards. 
In the highlands of Java, Indonesia, the shade tree Leucaena glauca is the main food plant of P. citri at altitudes above 600 m. Measures that proved successful for the control of P. citri were mainly directed against infestation of this tree and consisted of removing the flower clusters or, when necessary, pruning all foliage and flowers. It is also claimed that P. citri can be controlled by increasing the shade in plantations and that this was undesirable for Robusta coffee but suitable for Arabica at high altitudes (Le Pelley, 1968). Good results were obtained by providing three covers, one above the other, of Leucaena, Erythrina and Albizia, or with Leucaena and Albizia only. It is further suggested that because the insect infests mainly the flowers and pods of L. glauca, other shade trees that seldom flower, such as L. pulverulenta [L. leucocephala], or a sterile hybrid of L. glauca and L. glabrosa should be planted (De Fluiter, 1939).

In Texas, USA, P. citri infestation on Citrus was controlled indirectly by controlling the milk vine Cynanchum unifarium [Cynanchum racemosum var. unifarium] (milk vine), a climbing plant that grows within the citrus tree canopy (French and Reeve, 1978).
Biological Control

P. citri is often attended by ants for the sugary honeydew it excretes. Ants from multiple genera are involved, including species of Crematogaster, Pheidole, Camponotus and Wasmanniaauropunctata, with different species active in different countries and conditions, on various crops (Way and Khoo, 1991). Ants defend the mealybugs from predators and parasitoids, and can render biological control agents ineffective. Ant control is therefore an essential component in the biological control of P. citri.
P. citri has natural enemies in 22 genera belonging to 7 families (García et al., 2016). Several natural enemies, both parasitoids and predators, have been studied and evaluated for the biological control of P. citri (Viggiani, 1974; Berlinger et al., 1979, 1985; Barbier and Raimbault, 1985; Mani and Krishnamoorthy, 1990a,b,c; Reddy et al., 1991, 1992, 1997, Reyd et al., 1991; Islam and Jahan, 1992, 1993; Kanika-Kiamfu et al., 1993; Khandakar and Jahan, 1993; Su & Li, 1993, Vos et al., 1993; van Baaren et al., 1994; Yigit et al., 1994; Blumberg et al., 1995; Mani, 1995). The food plants of the pest may affect the activity of natural enemies (Copland et al., 1993). Natural enemies that have been successfully used include the parasitoids Leptomastix dactylopii, of South American origin, and Anagyrus pseudococci; and the predators Cryptolaemus montrouzieri and Exochomus flavipes (Panis and Brun, 1971; Panis, 1977; Narasimham, 1987; Pillai, 1987; Smith et al., 1988; Viggiani, 1988; Nagarkatti et al., 1992; Reddy et al., 1992, Barbagallo et al., 1993; Reddy and Bhat, 1993a; Mani, 1994).

P. citri was successfully controlled with the introduced predator C. montrouzieri and the parasitoid L. dactylopii in Italy (Panis, 1977), Sicily (Liotta et al., 1976), France (Panis and Brun, 1971), India (Pillai, 1987; Reddy et al., 1992; Reddy and Bhat, 1993b; Mani, 1994), former USSR (Kurdyukov and Alan, 1973), Queensland in Australia (Smith et al., 1988), Italy (Fronteddu et al., 1996) and Morocco (Abdelkhalek et al., 1998).

In Peru, the encyrtid parasitoid Pauridia peregrina [Coccidoexnoides peregrinus], which was introduced accidentally from Texas (USA) and first discovered in Peru in 1963, gave remarkably good control of P. citri on Citrus (Salazar, 1972).

On Citrus in the former Soviet Union (Niyazov, 1969), P. citri was kept under control by the indigenous parasitoid Anagyrus pseudococci, which destroyed up to 75% of the mealybug population in areas that were not treated with insecticides. In Turkmenistan and Georgia, however, the effects of Leptomastix abnormis [Leptomastidea abnormis] and Leptomastix dactylopii introduced from the USA in 1960 were much reduced by the presence of hyperparasitoids such as Chartocerus subaeneus, which was also responsible for 18-20% parasitism of another parasitoid, Allotropa mecrida, which in turn was responsible for up to 20% parasitism of P. citri. The larvae of predatory Leucopis alticeps and Crysopa carnea [Chrysoperla carnea] are reported as virtually destroying all stages of P. citri in the former USSR, and introduction of Clausenia josefi from the Mediterranean was discussed (Niyazov, 1969).

In Athens (Greece), introduced C. montrouzieri failed to establish on Citrus, whereas in Antibes (France) it was found to be effective at temperatures above 20°C but proved ineffective at lower temperatures or in the presence of attendant ants (Panis and Brun, 1971). In Israel, laboratory and field experiments showed that the efficacy of predators was reduced when P. citri fed on the alkaloid-containing legumes Erythrina corallodendrum and Spartium junceum, compared to non-toxic plants (Mendel et al., 1992).

Studies conducted in Italy on hypersensitivity and allergic responses in a group of workers employed in breeding insects for biological pest control showed a lesser degree of allergy to P. citri than to other insects (Cipolla et al., 1997).

Laboratory experiments conducted at Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA, on Coleus, showed that plant size, variegation and other parameters including plant height, leaf number and leaf area had no significant effect on attack rates, searching strategy and selected life history characteristics of C. montrouzieri (Garcia and O'Neil, 2000). On the other hand, increasing prey density on plants significantly increased the rate of attack, which reached a plateau of approximately 3.5-4.0 prey attacked on plants containing 16 prey individuals. There was an inverse relationship between prey density and the estimated area searched. Moreover, C. montrouzieri development was slower, and survival and fourth-instar and adult body weight was lower when provided with fewer prey. However, the sex ratio was unaffected.

Laboratory experiments on the reproduction of C. montrouzieri showed that whilst the ladybirds did not reproduce or lay eggs after consuming Orthezia tillandsiae, a small amount of a feed mixture consisting of the ensign scales O. tillandsiae and P. citri at a ratio of 3:1 was enough to stimulate the ladybirds to lay eggs. A further experiment with the same feed-mixture showed that C. montrouzieri pupated and continued to develop (Voigt, 2000). In India the biology and predation of C. montrouzieri on P. citri and Dactylopius tomentosus was studied in the laboratory at 29.4-32.1°C and 65-71% RH (Baskaran et al., 1999). C. montrouzieri completed its growth successfully with both prey species, but preferred P. citri to D. tomentosus.

See also Waterhouse (1998).

On coffee in Kenya, P. citri is controlled indirectly by spraying chemicals or applying baits against attendant ants, to encourage natural enemies that would otherwise be killed by them (Le Pelley, 1968). Chlorpyrifos, deltamethrin, ethion and hydramethylnon were used to control ants on coffee in Kenya.
Phosalone, trichlormetafos-3, malathion and dimethoate were effective against P. citri in Peru and the former USSR (Khalilov, 1972; Kurdyukov and Alan, 1973). The most suitable periods for insecticide application on grapevines in the former USSR were during the transition phase and during the emergence of third-instar larvae; spraying could be replaced by the release of the predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. ULV application of malathion (Limon de la Oliva and Blasco Pascual, 1973) has also been used.

On grapefruits and oranges in Spain (province of Castellou), spot treatments with fenitrothion, fenitrothion + dimethoate or dimethoate were effective but expensive (Limon de la Oliva et al., 1972).

In Italy, 40 insecticides effective against P. citri were assessed for their effect on the natural enemies, Leptomastidea abnormis and Scymnus includens (Viggiani et al., 1972). Twenty-one of these, including a preparation of Bacillus thuringiensis, a mixed spray of chlorfensulphide [superseded], chlorfenethol [superseded], demeton [superseded], dicofol, liquid mineral oil and pyrethrum, were found to be least harmful to natural enemies.

Other chemicals used elsewhere include fenthion in Italy (Cabitza et al., 1994), dimethoate in Australia (Murray, 1978a) and, indirectly, chlorpyrifos, deltamethrin, ethion, hydramethylnon inacide and used to control attendant ants on coffee in Kenya to encourage survival of parasitoids and predators that would be killed by the ants (Anon., 1990). On persimmon fruits, the application of chlorpyrifos and diazinon around the trunk gave excellent results against mealybug attendant ants and greatly reduced the population of mealybugs (Izhar, 1999).

In Citrus orchards in Israel, the application of chlorpyrifos in early April (before flowering) prevented cork scars on fruits, whereas application in early summer (mid-June) only reduced damage (Gross et al., 1999).
In Maryland, USA, micronized dusts of chlorpyritos dispersed in a greenhouse by release of carbon dioxide proved highly effective against nymphs of P. citri (Smith and Boswell, 1972). In Tokat province (Italy), diazinon gave effective control in two applications made 5 weeks apart in June and July (Aykac and Erguder, 1972). These three insecticides were also found to be effective in Turkey. In Bulgaria, phenthoate was most effective, but was phytotoxic to ferns. Dimethoate also afforded some control (Tsalev, 1970).

In a study of the influence of six selective pesticides on adult longevity, progeny production and prey consumption by the predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, no detrimental effects were observed on progeny production of the beetle on plants treated with chlorpyrifos, neem seed kernel extract, dicofol and copper oxychloride. Diflubenzuron had a pronounced effect on the adult females, yielding only 278 progeny compared to 419 by untreated females (Mani et al., 1997). It was suggested that these selective pesticides, with the exception of diflubenzuron, could be considered in integrated pest management programmes.

Pirimiphos-methyl effectively controlled P. citri, scales and beetles on yam tubers in storage and as a result significantly reduced associated fungal infections caused by Fusarium spp., Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., Curvularia spp., Epicoccum spp. and Helminthosporium spp. (Morse et al., 2000).
In Cyprus, the development of resistance by P. citri to some insecticides was reported (Cyprus Agricultural Research Institute, 1981).

In quarantine, suspected host plants or plant parts may be dipped in insecticidal solutions such as an insecticidal soap composed of potassium salts of fatty acids with fluvalinate (Hansen et al., 1992a). Alternatively, plants may be subjected to vapour heat treatment as described by Hansen et al. (1992b). Anthurium andreanum, Leucospermum sp. and the flowers and foliage of orchids were, however, very sensitive to the vapour heat treatment.

In Australia, a greater reduction in fruit infected with P. citri in the calyx was achieved with low volume pesticide spraying than with a conventional high volume pesticide sprayer (Cunningham and Harden, 1999). The reduction in insecticide dose rate using lower spray volumes resulted in the pests not being controlled in some of the lower volume treatments.

Growth Regulators

Tests on insect growth regulators showed that kinoprene and epotenonane (R010-3108) gave effective control of P. citri comparable to that achieved with conventional insecticides such as dimethoate and methiodathion (French and Reeve, 1979).
The synthetic juvenile hormone analogues kinoprene (ZR-777) and hydroprene (ZR-512) prolonged the duration of the total life cycle and reduced female fecundity (Gaaboub et al., 1979), but female emergence was much less affected. In Switzerland, Vogel et al. (1977) showed that nymphs of P. citri treated with the juvenile hormone epofenonane moulted several times into intermediate forms between nymph and adult, the number of anal pores being reduced during each supernumerary moult.
In California, the insect growth regulators, ZR-619, ZR-512, ZR-520 and ZR-777 all reduced the number of progeny due to adult mortality as well as sterility induced in the survivors (Staal et al., 1973). In Ohio, insect growth regulators (kinoprene), Safer's soap and Murphy's Oil soap (a non-insecticide preparation) reduced the number of citrus mealybugs (presumably including P. citri) on foliage plants (Lindquist, 1981). The moulting inhibitor buprofenzin inhibited development of first-instar nymphs of P. citri and also (at lower concentrations) resulted in a marked decrease in the egg production of surviving females in laboratory studies in Hungary (Darvas and Szabo, 1987). Vogel et al. (1976) showed that applications of epofenonane could be as effective for the control of P. citri on grapefruits as dimethoate.

The insect growth regulator buprofezin was effective at three different application rates against P. citri on celery plants 26 days after treatment, when large numbers of dead early-instar larvae were observed on buprofezin-treated plants (Bedford et al., 1996). There was an indication that effects on mealybugs were greater, the higher the rate of buprofezin applied. However, low numbers of surviving mealybugs, within even the highest rate, indicated that a repeat application may be required for complete or continued control. No phytotoxic damage or response was observed on any of the celery plants within any of the treatments.

Pheromones

Several synthetic analogues of the sex pheromone dextro-cis-planococcyl acetate have been developed in the former USSR, Sweden, Israel, Japan and Italy (Rotundo and Tremblay, 1974, 1975, 1976a, 1980a, b; Dunkelblum et al., 1986). One analogue has been effectively used to monitor P. citri populations (Panis, 1979); its use for control purposes is quite promising (Rotundo and Tremblay, 1975) because it has proved highly attractive to males under field conditions.

Plant Extracts/Botanical Insecticides

Other unconventional chemical control agents include Citrus oil mixed with azinphos methyl which gave 96% mortality of P. citri in Texas (USA). In Florida, combinations of a hexane extract of the seed of neem (Azadirachta indica) and several of its chromatographic fractions significantly deterred feeding by P. citri and other insects (Jacobson et al., 1978).

In Alexandria (Egypt), application of emulsion sprays containing 3% petroleum distillate and various emulsifiers, all locally produced, gave good control on guavas for up to 5 weeks after treatment in September (El-Sebae and El-Akkawi, 1971).

In a field trial in Karnataka, India, neem oil and Pongamia [?pinnata] oil (both at 4%) were recommended for the control of P. citri on guava, causing 93.2 and 89.4% mortality of the pest, respectively, 10 days after the second spray (applied 10 days after the first) (Hussain et al., 1996).

Simmonds et al. (2000) demonstrated that a crude neem seed extract; a formulation of azadirachtin, a pyrethrum extract, and one of two naphthoquinones isolated from Calceolaria andina (BTG 504 and BTG 505) all influenced the foraging behaviour of C. montrouzieri exposed to leaves and P. citri. Larval and adult foraging behaviour was influenced most by BTG 504 and neem also affected larval behaviour; the predators contacted fewer treated leaves and spent less time on treated than on untreated leaves. The larvae also consumed fewer mealybugs treated with BTG 504 and BTG 505 than untreated mealybugs.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

In Florida, USA, a combination of selected chemicals, natural enemies and cultural practices was used to maintain populations of P. citri on Citrus below economic levels (Knapp, 1981).
In greenhouse experiments aimed at developing integrated control methods for P. citri and Nephus reunioni on potted orange trees, the predator C. montrouzieri effectively reduced populations of P. citri at a predator:prey ratio of 1:15 (Hamid et al., 1997). In most cases, no significant differences in pest reductions were detected between C. montrouzieri and insecticide.

On coffee in Kenya, P. citri was controlled indirectly by spraying chemicals such as chlorpyrifos or deltamethrin or applying hydramethylnon as baits against attendant ants in an attempt to encourage natural enemies that would otherwise be killed by the ants (Anon., 1990).
In Crete (Greece) no significant differences were detected between control of P. citri with C. montrouzieri alone and integrated control with C. montrouzieri and chemical treatment (Hamid and Michelakis, 1994). In Italy, however, Viggiani and Tranfaglia (1978) showed in laboratory experiments that the insecticides temephos, methomyl [now banned] and deltamethrin were harmful to L. dactylopii whereas fenbutatin oxide was harmless.

Arthur and Wiendl (1996) showed that irradiation had adverse effects on the development of P. citri. After 50 days of irradiation at different dosages, there were 2087.25 ± 301.34 individuals for the control, and 1348.25 ± 349.77, 288.25 ± 129.62, and 54.25 ± 61.98 individuals for doses of 10, 20 and 30 Gy, respectively. Insects treated with 40 Gy or higher dosages produced no offspring.

Katsoyannos (1996) reviewed progress on integrated pest management, especially biological control, for the main insect pests of citrus including P. citri, in northern Mediterranean countries.

In a field study of an integrated strategy for the control of P. citri, aphids and scale insects on Citrus in eastern Sicily (Italy) involving the control of attendant ants, chlorpyrifos gave the best control and was the least costly (Tumminelli et al., 1997). Insecticidal gum applied to the trunk gave better results than pyrethrum, but had phytotoxic effect on trees less than 10 years old and was also costly to apply. It was concluded that in integrated control programmes, the best time to treat ants and to release beneficial insects was between April and September.

A study in Italy on the biology, damage caused and control of the most important pests of table grapes, including P. citri and P. ficus, produced criteria for reducing the number of pesticide treatments in vineyards and a scheme for the biological control of pests and diseases on grapes (Guario and Laccone, 1996). Also in In Italy, Viggiani (1975a) observed that an infestation level of about 5% was regarded as the threshold for chemical control.

Chemical Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de-)registration of pesticides, we are for the moment not including any specific chemical control recommendations. For further information, we recommend you visit the following resources:
PAN pesticide database (www.pesticideinfo.org)
Your national pesticide guide

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 6 June 2016

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation